Mexican Daily Life Essay -- essays research papers

Daily LifeThere are a variety of common courtesies that Americans should observe when in Mexico. Some of the important issues of cultural etiquette are described herein. When in Mexico Americans should refrain from calling themselves Americans. Mexicans consider themselves Americans too since the whole continent is called America. Another part of Mexican culture that may be shocking to Americans traveling there is the way machismo is verbalized by male members of Mexican society. Making familiar or derogatory remarks at women is a typical part of the culture and should not be seen as harassment. Wearing a wedding band and mentioning children commonly will stop these types of comments. Attempting to speak Spanish even if your Spanish is not good is appreciated. When speaking in English slang and idioms should be avoided. Using disordered English does not aid communication and can be seen as offensive. Many Mexicans speak English but many more read English. If possible, a written c opy of what you are saying should be provided. Mexicans do not often say no because it is considered impolite. Consequently, it is important that you recognize this and look for other clues as to what the actually answer is. If a Mexican says maybe it is a good indicator that the answer is definitely no. Asking for a yes or no response to a specific question repeatedly is tolerated but you moldiness be patient because it will take a while before the real answer comes out. People stand much closer to each other in Mexico. It is considered unfriendly to back up when a Mexican approaches you in conversation. You must be aware of the tone of voice you use when in Mexico. Using a quick pace or a sharp or strong tone will make you come across unfavorably. Eye contact is not as direct or long as in the get together States. Mexicans are status conscientious so what you wear or what you drive makes a clear statement about who you are in society. When attending a social event you should a rrive 30 minutes late. Arriving earlier is considered rude. At small parties your host will embark you. At large parties you may introduce yourself. When dining you should not sit until you are told where to sit and you should not eat until the hostess starts. It is polite to keep both of your hands visible while consume and to leave some food on your plate when finished. yet men are permitt... ... intoxicant is used regularly in Mexico. The legal drinking geezerhood in Mexico is 18. There are responsible drinkers and alcoholics in Mexican society. Approximately 13% of the population has experienced alcohol dependency. Unfortunately incidents of alcoholism are rising. Alcohol is used disproportionatly by men because of Mexican gender roles which promote risky behavior for men and conservative behavior for women. Alcohol is permitted in both fear and social settings. In business alcohol is most appropriate during lunch or diner meetings.Mexican leisure activity is similar to th at of the United States. Mexicans approve television, concerts, movies, picnics, shopping and sports. Soccer is the most popular sport. Businesses that provide picnic tables and soccer fields for use by employees on their lunch hour are viewed very positively by Mexicans. Fiestas, birthdays and traditional holidays are also enjoyed by all members of Mexican society. The types of leisure activities that Mexicans enjoy do not vary for the different income levels. Only the amount of time and money one can invest in these activities varies from one class to another.

Social Issues Essay -- essays research papers

Is Mcdonaldization Inevitable? George Ritzers, Mcdonaldization of Society, is a critical analysis of the impact on social structural change on human interaction and identity. According to Ritzer, Mcdonaldization is the process by which the principles of the fast-food relieveraurant are coming to dominate more and more sectors of American hostel as well as rest of the world (Ritzer, 1). Ritzer focuses on four foundations of Mcdonaldization efficiency, calcul talent, predictability, and control. These are the commandments of any rationalized corporation. However, they are not carried out from the point of view of the consumer. Efficiency, for example, may entail the placing of great inconveniences upon a consumer for the interest of efficient management. Calculability may involve hiding certain information from the consumer. Predictability and control may involve a companys ability to predict and control consumer behavior, not the consumers ability to predict what kind of product or control what kind of service he gets. Ritzer calls such(prenominal) breakdowns "the irrationality of rationalization." Ritzer points out the irrationality of rationality, as all of the alleged(a) benefits of Mcdonaldized remainss backfire waiting in long lines, suspect quality, little or no customer service, little or no customer service, the illusion of declamatory quantities for low prices, and severely limited selection of choice. Throughout Mcdonaldization of Society, Ritzer describes Mcdonaldization as largely negative and often destructive. While Mcdonaldization is rapidly taking over American society and spreading to the rest of the globe, it is not something unjustly imposed on the American people. The consumerist culture of America has groomed the public to seek efficiency, calculability, predictability, and control. These principles grow in immensity and value in contemporary America. Even when given the choice to avoid a Mcdonaldized establishment or produc t, people will flock to it. I play off with Ritzers analysis of a Mcdonaldized society, barely I feel that Ritzer has failed to provide any real solutions to the Mcdonaldization process. I will support Ritzers analysis of the Mcdonaldization process, but also show that it is inevitable and essential in the American society to have a rationalized system. Ritzer stresses that Mcdonaldization does not just refer to robotlike assemb... ...ety, companies are looking for to maximize profits and managers are looking to maximize sales. Employers want efficiency and predictability from their workers. They want to be able to control their employees. With so much of the day worn out(p) at work and commuting, the only way people can get everything done everyday is to rely on time saving methods. With increasing productiveness and development comes an increasingly rationalized system. Regardless of who benefits or to what extent, the universal result is homogenization. Rationalized systems have a pronounced tendency to squash individual tastes, niche markets, small-scale opening move and personalized customer service. Differences are leveled, wrinkles smoothed, knots cut off -- convenience at the expense of character. An overwhelming sameness develops, along with a decrease in responsiveness. The system that seeks to mimic a machine becomes a machine, incapable of making exceptions or taking risks. I believe that the greatest loss is that most people discern of no other society than the rationalized society and therefore cannot even hope to deviate from it. For good or for bad, our social destiny is to live in such prepackaged settings.

An Intellectual and Emotional Response to Oedipus the King :: Oedipus the King Oedipus Rex

An Intellectual and Emotional Response to Oedipus the King While reading the unravel Oedipus the King, my reply to the walkover became more and more clear as the play continued. When I finished the play, my reaction to the work and to two particular characters was startling and very different from my response while I was still reading. My initial response was to the text, and it was mostly an smart one. I felt cheated by the play because the challenge of solving the mystery of the spell was spoiled for me by the obvious clues laid out in the work. My second response was not as intellectual instead, it came more from a feeling that the play evoked in me. I felt a strong disappointment in the drastic actions that Oedipus and Jocasta took at the end of the play. My two different responses to Oedipus the King, one intellectual and one not, now seem to feed off and to amplify each other as if they were one collective response. The plays plot, in a nutshell, develops like this. a fterwards solving the riddle of the Sphynx, who had kept Thebes under a curse of some kind, Oedipus is invited to become king of the city. He marries Jocasta, the widow of the previous king, and they have two children. When the play begins, Thebes is again under some sort of curse, and Oedipus tries to find out its cause so that he can rescue the city. He is told that the cause of the curse is that the receiver of the previous king is still in the city and has gone unpunished. In the process of searching for the murderer, Oedipus discovers that it is he, himself, who is responsible and that he is actually the son of Jocasta and her previous husband. alarm by his sins of incest and murder, Oedipus claws out his eyes. Jocasta commits suicide because she is so disgraced. My disappointment in the lack of mystery in the plot of the play was evoked by the continual clues seem throughout the play. For example, in Oedipuss first speech to the people of Thebes, he condemns the murderer of the previous king, stating that he will suffer no unbearable punishment, nothing worsened than exile (261-62). This is the first of a multitude of clues about the outcome of the play.

community responsibilities :: essays research papers

Do you believe that our community should get draws, or do you believe that everybody should be truly equal in our environment? The United States is living in an environment where in that location is a small grouping of loss loss leaders that crystallize determinations for everyone else. When you hear somebody say they are going to make purposes for you, you might be thinking you would have to tale that decision no outlet what. Well, thats wrong, there is still an opportunity on weather you have to take the decision or not. There are votes, when you vote you either break of disagree with any decisions. If there were more masses that disagree than there were people that agree, and then you were left with what you wanted. You still had the opportunity to choose what you wanted. Being with a group of leaders to make decisions for a caller doesnt necessarily mean that you would have to take the decision. No matter what you still have the encounter to decide. A group of pe ople needs to be over others to help guide and make decisions because with no leader everything would be out of control, everybodys decisions would not be heard, and a group with no leader would never be efficient.A group of people needs a leader because without a leader everybody would be out of control and nobody would be able to deal with them. Without a leader not everything would be controlled. Anybody in a society with no leader would not know what he or she is doing. They wont know what doing because there is not one decision maker that has good reasons for those decisions. Groups of people would gather around making nuthouse about everything. Some people make chaos and act wild because they dont have a leader to till them what is right and wrong. People would be wild because they wouldnt be controlled and it is undoable to get a big group of people unneurotic at the same time to be dealed with. Being out of control is not the only(prenominal) problem with being equal, bu t everybodys decisions would not be heard.Without having a leader not everybodys decisions or opinions would be heard. A group of people or society always needs a leader so everybodys decisions would be heard. Without a leader there would not be oftentimes communication. If a person comes up with a good decision or idea that person would not be able to let the whole society know about his or her ideas.community responsibilities essays research written document Do you believe that our community should have leaders, or do you believe that everybody should be truly equal in our environment? The United States is living in an environment where there is a small group of leaders that make decisions for everyone else. When you hear somebody say they are going to make decisions for you, you might be thinking you would have to tale that decision no matter what. Well, thats wrong, there is still an opportunity on weather you have to take the decision or not. There are votes, when you vote you either agree of disagree with any decisions. If there were more people that disagree than there were people that agree, then you were left with what you wanted. You still had the opportunity to choose what you wanted. Being with a group of leaders to make decisions for a society doesnt necessarily mean that you would have to take the decision. No matter what you still have the chance to decide. A group of people needs to be over others to help guide and make decisions because with no leader everything would be out of control, everybodys decisions would not be heard, and a group with no leader would never be efficient.A group of people needs a leader because without a leader everybody would be out of control and nobody would be able to deal with them. Without a leader not everything would be controlled. Anybody in a society with no leader would not know what he or she is doing. They wont know what doing because there is not one decision maker that has good reasons for those decis ions. Groups of people would gather around making chaos about everything. Some people make chaos and act wild because they dont have a leader to till them what is right and wrong. People would be wild because they wouldnt be controlled and it is impossible to get a big group of people together at the same time to be dealed with. Being out of control is not the only problem with being equal, but everybodys decisions would not be heard.Without having a leader not everybodys decisions or opinions would be heard. A group of people or society always needs a leader so everybodys decisions would be heard. Without a leader there would not be much communication. If a person comes up with a good decision or idea that person would not be able to let the whole society know about his or her ideas.

Essay --

Children were made to work without pay and without their willingness they were raped, beat, and sometimes killed if they did not work. The definition of child labor is the misuse of children in industries or businesses when it is contract illegal or inhumane. In the late 1900s 18% of the American workers were under the season of 16. It didnt matter their age the adults pushed them to their very limits. They had children at the age of 4 working long hard hours. They had the children working so young because they had really small hands and bodies unlike the adults with full grown bodies. Women and children were the ones to support their families because they were agency tinier and able to do more than a man was able to in a factory.The ages ranged anywhere from 4 years to 21 and over. The starting age role back then was 49.9% and it is now 3.9%. Children 10-13 was 27.9% and is now 25.3%, 14-17 was 10.3% and is now 22.1%, 18-20 was 4.1% and is now 11.8%. These children would work u p to 12 hours a day and had little to no breaks. They believed that they didnt shoot breaks or that they werent doing as good as they were supposed to be doing so they gave those that got them minimal breaks.Some of the jobs they had to do were in dangerous places in the factories. They were in areas where there were toxic feel and the machinery they had to run all of it was very dangerous and caused many injuries and deaths. The machinery ran so quickly that fingers, legs, and arms could have very easily gotten caught in them. The machines could have caused way more serious injuries if not treated could have infections set in or it could have caused deaths from serious blood loss. The environments that these children were in had fumes and toxins e... ...ent during this period. But the gaps that remained, particularly in the southern states, led to the decision to work for a federal child labor law. Congress passed such laws in 1916 and 1918, that the Supreme Court ended up dec laring them unconstitutional. Congress did eventually pass such an amendment in 1924, but the conservative political climate of the 1920s, together with ambition from some church groups and farming organizations that feared the possible increase of federal power in areas related to children, prevented many states from ratifying it. They passed an act called the National Industrial Recovery feign to reduce the use of child labor. They also passed the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, which in turn for the first time set national minimum profit and maximum hour standards for workers in interstate commerce, also placed limitations on child labor.

Essay --

Children were made to work without pay and without their willingness they were raped, beat, and sometimes killed if they did not work. The explanation of child labor is the misuse of children in industries or businesses when it is consider illegal or inhumane. In the late 1900s 18% of the American workers were under the bestride of 16. It didnt matter their age the adults pushed them to their very limits. They had children at the age of 4 working long hard hours. They had the children working so young because they had really fine hands and bodies unlike the adults with full grown bodies. Women and children were the ones to support their families because they were way tinier and able to do more than a man was able to in a factory.The ages ranged anyplace from 4 years to 21 and over. The starting age percentage back then was 49.9% and it is now 3.9%. Children 10-13 was 27.9% and is now 25.3%, 14-17 was 10.3% and is now 22.1%, 18-20 was 4.1% and is now 11.8%. These children would wo rk up to 12 hours a day and had little to no breaks. They believed that they didnt need breaks or that they werent doing as good as they were supposed to be doing so they gave those that got them nominal breaks.Some of the jobs they had to do were in dangerous places in the factories. They were in areas where there were toxic fumes and the machinery they had to run all of it was very dangerous and caused many injuries and deaths. The machinery ran so quickly that fingers, legs, and arms could have very easily gotten caught in them. The machines could have caused way more serious injuries if not treated could have infections set in or it could have caused deaths from serious blood loss. The environments that these children were in had fumes and toxins e... ...ent during this period. But the gaps that remained, particularly in the southern states, led to the decision to work for a federal child labor law. Congress passed such laws in 1916 and 1918, but the Supreme Court ended up d eclaring them unconstitutional. Congress did eventually pass such an amendment in 1924, but the conservative political climate of the 1920s, together with opposition from some church groups and farming organizations that feared the possible increase of federal power in areas link to children, prevented many states from ratifying it. They passed an act called the National Industrial Recovery Act to reduce the use of child labor. They also passed the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, which in revoke for the first time set national minimum wage and maximum hour standards for workers in interstate commerce, also placed limitations on child labor.