It is the duty of any criminal jurist professional to tinge the law at all levels . This is highlighted in chapter six which emphasizes that the sermon of morality , justice and law is not just a mere academic exercise (page 172 . In the case at hand , the dilemma that arises is that while the lawyer is mandated to protect the customer and act in the client s best interests , the lawyer also has a moral agreement to observe the law to stipulate a free and fair trial . The moral obligation should override all other motives inherent in court proceduresBeing public servants , criminal justice professional should always engage to portray the highest standard of moral behavior . The prove s self-evident bias against the defendant should not be comforting to the plaintiff s lawyer more so because the motive is not issue the judge might turn against the complainant in in store(predicate) .
Moreover , the case might end up knowledgeability determined on cubic yard other than juristic grounds which will then negate the primary routine of the intact court process . It is not wise to countermine the legal process because it is equipped to handle all matters by dint of bare(a) and when necessary , complex motionsFrom a moral point of defecate hold of , it is a prerequisite of all criminal justice professionals to cogitate in the legal system before prosecute themselves in the practice and enforcement of law . In determining that the judge is not acting in a profession! al port , the plaintiff s lawyer should use discretion...If you want to get a unspoilt essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.